Checked, not settled
The evidence goes against this.
“The Club of Rome's Limits to Growth, published in the early 1970s, rested on the false premise that humans would overcrowd the planet's scarce surface area and thereby degrade living conditions for everyone.”
Say instead: Limits to Growth states its model investigated five trends, none of them surface area or crowding.
3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted
Contradicted · 0.1780 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 3 of 4 · provisional until audited. The number is model-conditional, not a share of truth.
Share:
Checked in Galedra: score 0.18, mostly against · not yet reviewed by anyone else
“The Club of Rome's Limits to Growth, published in the early 1970s, rested on the false premise that humans would overcrowd the planet's scarce surface area and thereby degrade living conditions for…”
https://galedra.org/claims/08af2723-b998-830b-8514-5c19d8598768/card
Or just the link: https://galedra.org/claims/08af2723-b998-830b-8514-5c19d8598768/card
See the evidence · 
Galedra