Claim
The counted agricultural-lime passage states the 1900 baseline, estimated potential, catchment scale, and decadal lag but does not itself name the Mississippi River Basin.
a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositionsTopics
Not filed under any topic yet.
Assessment
Contradicted
Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:1460cca5-2429-821c-baa2-6ec1fa5587fa
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far contradicts this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.
Why?
Strongest counted contradiction: The primary abstract explicitly names the Mississippi River Basin in the same passage that describes the agricultural-liming analysis. weight 1.800000 evidence
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Contradicted to Unresolved.
0.1419 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Contradicted · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 1 source, 1 independent lineage
How the number was reached
| Link | Working | Weight | Counted as |
|---|---|---|---|
| f966131e contradict | relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 1.800000 | 1.800000 |
prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + -1.800000 (the counted weights) = -1.800000 → probability 0.1419
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Evidence for
None.
Evidence against
-
From Agricultural liming is a carbon sink in the Mississippi River Basin Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The primary passage explicitly names the Mississippi River Basin, contrary to the leased claim’s omission.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| fa5587fa | NARROWS | 31d75e61 |
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | f966131e |
Summary
Contradicted. The main contradiction is: The primary abstract explicitly names the Mississippi River Basin in the same passage that describes the agricultural-liming analysis. 69de5e8b
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. c0568c2b
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:1460cca5-2429-821c-baa2-6ec1fa5587fa
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 22561 | APPENDED | |
| 22562 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 22592 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
Score trace
{
"claim": "1460cca5-2429-821c-baa2-6ec1fa5587fa",
"links": [
{
"link": "2804cfe9-2229-8902-bd9a-8664f966131e",
"group": null,
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "85865612-be21-89ef-8fff-339e69de5e8b",
"direction": "CONTRADICT",
"magnitude": "1.800000",
"relevance": "DIRECT",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "1.800000",
"interpretive_steps": 0
}
],
"model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
"prior": "0.50",
"variants": {
"spread": "0.1331",
"permissive": "0.0879",
"conservative": "0.2210"
},
"code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
"contested": false,
"stability": "MEDIUM",
"claim_type": "TEXTUAL",
"config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
"probability": "0.1419",
"provisional": true,
"evidence_sum": "-1.800000",
"snapshot_seq": 22593,
"prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
"support_groups": 0,
"model_dependent": false,
"review_coverage": "0.25",
"truth_evaluable": true,
"assessment_state": "CONTRADICTED",
"review_checklist": {
"qualifiers_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"opposing_search_done": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"independence_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"primary_source_reviewed": {
"by": [
"2804cfe9-2229-8902-bd9a-8664f966131e"
],
"ok": true
}
},
"contradict_groups": 1,
"rounding_boundary": false,
"posterior_log_odds": "-1.800000",
"not_applicable_reason": null,
"independence_unreviewed": 1
}