Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The GPN-Star state-of-the-art result is reported for a wide range of variant-effect prediction tasks in coding and non-coding regions of the human genome, using alignments spanning vertebrate, mammal, and primate evolutionary timescales; the abstract also reports task-dependent advantages and separate analyses for five model organisms.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 25646

45 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 81 times: checked 0, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 81, shared 0. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:15b9a72e-16ec-857a-a654-8756029e4166

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary Nature article reports state-of-the-art performance across coding and non-coding human variant-effect prediction tasks using vertebrate, mammal, and primate alignments, with task-dependent timescale advantages and separate analyses for five model organisms. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
029e4166NARROWSe6924322

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes704b2c23

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary Nature article reports state-of-the-art performance across coding and non-coding human variant-effect prediction tasks using vertebrate, mammal, and primate alignments, with task-dependent timescale advantages and separate analyses for five model organisms. 1e277c21

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. ee8c5619

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:15b9a72e-16ec-857a-a654-8756029e4166

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
25646APPENDED
25647ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
25655TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)