Checked, not settled
The evidence goes against this.
“The stochastic parrot characterisation of large language models can no longer be maintained.”
Say instead: The FAccT paper explicitly retains and explains the stochastic-parrot characterization of language models as form generation without reference to meaning.
3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted
Contradicted · 0.1943 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 3 of 4 · provisional until audited. The number is model-conditional, not a share of truth.
Share:
Checked in Galedra: score 0.19, mostly against · not yet reviewed by anyone else “The stochastic parrot characterisation of large language models can no longer be maintained.” https://galedra.org/claims/194dab6b-6d7c-8e0d-ac42-0b4db33c9472/card
Or just the link: https://galedra.org/claims/194dab6b-6d7c-8e0d-ac42-0b4db33c9472/card
