Claim

All dogs go to heaven.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 296

Referenced 30 times: checked 0, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 28, shared 2. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Church history · 3bf73178

Assessment

Insufficient evidence

0 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted

0 independent evidence lineages · review checks 0 of 4 · stability n/a

Main unresolved issue: Review check not yet done: qualifiers reviewed coverage:1c17f56d-26ff-85b3-bb32-9daf2001b036

Why?

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Insufficient evidence to Supported.

Hide calculation

No probability. No counted evidence bears on this claim at this snapshot.

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:0588c5cc970b358e4ce41ab6c2fe61c6bb71bc79deb3870f0b1539a1a1b731a2

Last changed at entry seq 297; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

prior — → log-odds —

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Evidence for

None.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Insufficient evidence. No counted evidence bears on this claim yet. coverage:1c17f56d-26ff-85b3-bb32-9daf2001b036

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:1c17f56d-26ff-85b3-bb32-9daf2001b036

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
296	APPENDED
297	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION

Score trace

{
  "claim": "1c17f56d-26ff-85b3-bb32-9daf2001b036",
  "links": [],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": null,
  "variants": null,
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": null,
  "claim_type": "OBSERVATIONAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": null,
  "provisional": false,
  "evidence_sum": null,
  "snapshot_seq": 297,
  "prior_log_odds": null,
  "support_groups": 0,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.00",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": null,
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 0
}