Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: Fedorov's common task sought universal physical resurrection through future advances in science and technology. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “Nikolai Fedorov advocated universal physical resurrection of the dead through future science and technology.” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “Nikolai Fedorov advocated universal physical resurrection of the dead through future science and technology.” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
• “Nikolai Fedorov advocated universal physical resurrection of the dead through future science and technology.” · 1 claim · 22 September 2026

Evidence for

• Fedorov's common task sought universal physical resurrection through future advances in science and technology.

  From Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov (1829—1903) Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The scholarly reference directly characterizes Fedorov's Common Task as universal physical resurrection pursued through future science and technology.

  From Nikolai Fedorov Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Independent scholarly reference; distinct modern-philosophy and religion-history topic.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The encyclopedia describes Fedorov’s project as universal physical resurrection through future science and technology, not creating ancestor simulations or digitally resurrecting people.

  From Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  This directly supports Fedorov’s resurrection theme while narrowing the claim’s digital-simulation characterization; the source is a secondary encyclopedia account.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
5378	APPENDED
5379	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
5382	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
13721	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
17170	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)