Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Excavated artifacts indicate that Alekseevka-Sargary people predominantly inhabited Semiyarka, while Cherkaskul-like items suggest trade with other local groups.

Type HISTORICAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 13778

Referenced 116 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 79, shared 35. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Archaeology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:2c87a142-128b-8e3a-8e27-497ba873f17f

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from cambridge.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The Antiquity study directly reports the dominant Alekseevka-Sargary material and minority Cherkaskul finds indicating interaction with western Siberian groups. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly says Alekseevka-Sargary artifacts predominate and Cherkaskul-like items indicate likely trade with local peoples.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
2ab76068eb6b2059

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesadc6bd2b

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The Antiquity study directly reports the dominant Alekseevka-Sargary material and minority Cherkaskul finds indicating interaction with western Siberian groups. 7bd390f1

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 2ab76068

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 633a6383

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:2c87a142-128b-8e3a-8e27-497ba873f17f

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
13778APPENDED
13779ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
13784LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
13814TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
17759LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)