Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Plans for a Lion’s Head harbour lighthouse were prepared in November 1911 to replace a light on a pole.

Type HISTORICAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 12527

Referenced 109 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 67, shared 40. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Modern · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9121 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:3899f538-4b72-8afe-9811-549f0246fbc6

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 0 of 4 review checks have been done.A quoted passage from brucepeninsulapress.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The local historical account dates planning to November 1911 and construction, storm damage, and restoration to 1913–1914. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly states that November 1911 plans replaced a pole light with a lighthouse plan.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
341b456c475fcaeb

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The local historical account dates planning to November 1911 and construction, storm damage, and restoration to 1913–1914. 58e1cea8

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 341b456c

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. c2998f3e

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:3899f538-4b72-8afe-9811-549f0246fbc6

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
12527APPENDED
12528ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
12537LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
12542TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
12603LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)