Claim
Plans for a Lion’s Head harbour lighthouse were prepared in November 1911 to replace a light on a pole.
Topics
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:3899f538-4b72-8afe-9811-549f0246fbc6
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 0 of 4 review checks have been done.A quoted passage from brucepeninsulapress.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The local historical account dates planning to November 1911 and construction, storm damage, and restoration to 1913–1914. weight 1.800000 evidence
Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly states that November 1911 plans replaced a pole light with a lighthouse plan.
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “Plans for a Lion’s Head harbour lighthouse were prepared in November 1911 to replace a light on a pole.” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
- “The Lion’s Head lighthouse history records plans prepared in November 1911, construction in 1913, and repair and restoration to its original location in 1914.” · 2 claims · 28 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From The Saga of the Lion’s Head Lighthouse Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
-
From The Saga of the Lion’s Head Lighthouse Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The date, planning action, and replacement purpose are explicit.
-
From Rise Again: Lion’s Head Lighthouse Version 3.0 Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted
The source corroborates the existence and date of the original plans, though it does not repeat the November date or pole-light purpose.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
| Evidence | Group | Kept instead |
|---|---|---|
| 341b456c | 475fcaeb |
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.
Review checklist
Review checks: 0 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | no |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The local historical account dates planning to November 1911 and construction, storm damage, and restoration to 1913–1914. 58e1cea8
1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 341b456c
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. c2998f3e
Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:3899f538-4b72-8afe-9811-549f0246fbc6
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 12527 | APPENDED | |
| 12528 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 12537 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 12542 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 12603 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |