Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: Independent reporting documents a concrete case of 10,000 AI agents being used for a scientific mathematics task, supporting the claim's scaled-research example, though not independently verifying Ismail's historical comparison or exact wording. weight 0.459000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Contradicted.

Hide calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “Ismail said that for 500 years science scaled with the number of brilliant scientists that could be trained, and claimed that it had now been demonstrated...” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
• “Ismail said that for 500 years science scaled with the number of brilliant scientists that could be trained, and claimed that it had now been demonstrated...” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026

Evidence for

• Independent reporting documents a concrete case of 10,000 AI agents being used for a scientific mathematics task, supporting the claim's scaled-research example, though not independently verifying Ismail's historical comparison or exact wording.

  From OpenAI claims to have solved Navier-Stokes math problem Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

  This is independent corroboration of the 10,000-agent scientific-work scale, not of every interpretive detail.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• Independent reporting documents a Stanford-led system coordinating 37,075 specialized AI agents on clinical-trial analysis, providing concrete evidence of research-task parallelization, but it does not establish Ismail's broader 500-year historical claim or the exact “spun up on a Tuesday afternoon” wording.

  From The AI Biotech With 37,000 Virtual Employees Just Published in Science Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

  This is related outside evidence, not corroboration of the exact attributed statement.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
56f4c27d	NARROWS	b973aa7c

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
8486	APPENDED
8487	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
11620	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
11797	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "40130415-8851-88b1-9b59-e15456f4c27d",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "3fadd1cc-0596-8d31-8305-44381d47e218",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "71ba7826-9124-85ea-96e6-3abdb67444a2",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.459000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "link": "c87efc31-906c-8bb4-937a-6676264080d7",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "99ac9721-94e0-8823-bfc6-1d37935b7b34",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0653",
    "permissive": "0.6449",
    "conservative": "0.5796"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "LOW",
  "claim_type": "INTERPRETIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.6128",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "0.459000",
  "snapshot_seq": 11798,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": true,
  "review_coverage": "0.00",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "LEANS_SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "0.459000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}