Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Mostaque said that people he knows at OpenAI told him the model was taking down “all sorts of problems that were previously intractable”; the excerpt does not identify the model, enumerate problems, or specifically establish results beyond Navier-Stokes.

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 8382

38 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 109 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 1, viewed 73, shared 33. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Leans supported

Score: 0.7146 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:424f1794-955b-8b32-84d4-57335ba1838a

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage from aiandsons.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: Independent reporting describes Astra solving ten previously open mathematical and theoretical-computer-science problems that had eluded human mathematicians for decades. weight 0.459000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Leans contradicted.

Hide calculation

0.7146 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Leans supported · Review checks: 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 2 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:a658bbe07d559633c6051584dc5066ccd0d94d9c5e35c4b81aee5198060d4245

Last changed at entry seq 12893; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
2b0ad410 support relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.459000 0.459000
f1329757 support relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.459000 0.459000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 0.918000 (the counted weights) = 0.918000 → probability 0.7146

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.6553 to 0.7673, a spread of 0.1120.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
5ba1838aNARROWS1918e80b

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Leans supported. The main support is: Independent reporting describes Astra solving ten previously open mathematical and theoretical-computer-science problems that had eluded human mathematicians for decades. 556329c3

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 77409f68

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:424f1794-955b-8b32-84d4-57335ba1838a

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
8382APPENDED
8383ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
10656LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
12892LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "424f1794-955b-8b32-84d4-57335ba1838a",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "9f06d690-6845-8bfd-9568-48402b0ad410",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "0a4f1b7f-cb19-87f8-ac1a-ee0d556329c3",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.459000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "link": "d7bf80bf-7961-851b-a2e9-a07ff1329757",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "e9904bd3-8f54-89dc-a8b9-d3c9e55cd08a",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "VIDEO",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.459000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1120",
    "permissive": "0.7673",
    "conservative": "0.6553"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "TEXTUAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.7146",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "0.918000",
  "snapshot_seq": 12893,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.00",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "LEANS_SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "0.918000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}