Claim
Mostaque said that people he knows at OpenAI told him the model was taking down “all sorts of problems that were previously intractable”; the excerpt does not identify the model, enumerate problems, or specifically establish results beyond Navier-Stokes.
38 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositionsTopics
Not filed under any topic yet.
Assessment
Leans supported
Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:424f1794-955b-8b32-84d4-57335ba1838a
Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage from aiandsons.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.
Why?
Strongest counted support: Independent reporting describes Astra solving ten previously open mathematical and theoretical-computer-science problems that had eluded human mathematicians for decades. weight 0.459000 evidence
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Leans contradicted.
0.7146 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Leans supported · Review checks: 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 2 sources, 2 independent lineages
How the number was reached
| Link | Working | Weight | Counted as |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2b0ad410 support | relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 0.459000 | 0.459000 |
| f1329757 support | relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 0.459000 | 0.459000 |
prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 0.918000 (the counted weights) = 0.918000 → probability 0.7146
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “Mostaque said that people he knows at OpenAI told him the model was taking down “all sorts of problems that were previously intractable”; the excerpt does...” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
- “Mostaque said that people he knows at OpenAI told him the model was taking down “all sorts of problems that were previously intractable”; the excerpt does...” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From Moonshots with Peter Diamandis #287 transcript Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted
Supports the attributed statement but remains hearsay, does not identify the model, and does not enumerate results.
-
From OpenAI's Astra Solves Decades-Old Math Problems: A New Era for AI Discovery Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted
The report supports the underlying result, but does not independently verify Mostaque's personal attribution or enumerate the broader set of problems.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| 5ba1838a | NARROWS | 1918e80b |
Review checklist
Review checks: 0 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | no |
Summary
Leans supported. The main support is: Independent reporting describes Astra solving ten previously open mathematical and theoretical-computer-science problems that had eluded human mathematicians for decades. 556329c3
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 77409f68
Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:424f1794-955b-8b32-84d4-57335ba1838a
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 8382 | APPENDED | |
| 8383 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 10656 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 12892 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
Score trace
{
"claim": "424f1794-955b-8b32-84d4-57335ba1838a",
"links": [
{
"link": "9f06d690-6845-8bfd-9568-48402b0ad410",
"group": null,
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "0a4f1b7f-cb19-87f8-ac1a-ee0d556329c3",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"magnitude": "0.459000",
"relevance": "MODERATE",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "0.459000",
"interpretive_steps": 1
},
{
"link": "d7bf80bf-7961-851b-a2e9-a07ff1329757",
"group": null,
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "e9904bd3-8f54-89dc-a8b9-d3c9e55cd08a",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"magnitude": "0.459000",
"relevance": "MODERATE",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "VIDEO",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "0.459000",
"interpretive_steps": 1
}
],
"model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
"prior": "0.50",
"variants": {
"spread": "0.1120",
"permissive": "0.7673",
"conservative": "0.6553"
},
"code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
"contested": false,
"stability": "MEDIUM",
"claim_type": "TEXTUAL",
"config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
"probability": "0.7146",
"provisional": true,
"evidence_sum": "0.918000",
"snapshot_seq": 12893,
"prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
"support_groups": 2,
"model_dependent": false,
"review_coverage": "0.00",
"truth_evaluable": true,
"assessment_state": "LEANS_SUPPORTED",
"review_checklist": {
"qualifiers_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"opposing_search_done": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"independence_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"primary_source_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
}
},
"contradict_groups": 0,
"rounding_boundary": false,
"posterior_log_odds": "0.918000",
"not_applicable_reason": null,
"independence_unreviewed": 2
}