Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The economic-contributor example is specifically an 80-year-old with the body and mind of a 50-year-old.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 14486

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 95 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 69, shared 25. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9654 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 0 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:44d18087-60bc-8684-af36-b433eadcf604

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 0 of 4 review checks have been done.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Not assessed

Why?

Strongest counted support: The article explicitly gives the economic-contributor example as an 80-year-old with the body and mind of a 50-year-old. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
eadcf604NARROWS9b5ab99b

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The speaker's example is an 80-year-old with the body and mind of a 50-year-old. 987757d8

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. b9a0c4ba

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:44d18087-60bc-8684-af36-b433eadcf604

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
14486APPENDED
14487ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
14506LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
14538TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)