Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: UC Berkeley explicitly says the 1–3 gigaton global estimate is based solely on Mojave soils and could be higher. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The global 1–3 gigaton estimate is based solely on Mojave soils, and the exact figure could be higher.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “The 1–3 gigaton global desert-soil carbon estimate is based solely on Mojave soils, and the exact figure could be higher.” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026

Evidence for

• The global 1–3 gigaton estimate is based solely on Mojave soils, and the exact figure could be higher.

  From UC Berkeley Scientists Find a Carbon Cycle Hiding in Desert Minerals Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Directly supports the narrower limitation claim; the source presents it as a caveat to a global extrapolation.

• UC Berkeley explicitly says the 1–3 gigaton global estimate is based solely on Mojave soils and could be higher.

  From UC Berkeley Scientists Find a Carbon Cycle Hiding in Desert Minerals Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The source directly states both the Mojave-only basis and possibility that the exact global figure is higher.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
422bc962		8a876b1e

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
07bb795e	NARROWS	25db8869

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	0054ca7c, 8a876b1e

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
13420	APPENDED
13421	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
13439	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
13488	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)