Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The 2026 report screened more than 60,000 Bianfu Cave bone fragments, selected 76 for ZooMS and 17 for proteomics, and identified three Denisovan bone fragments from layers dated approximately 167–134 thousand years ago; proteomics also confirmed two excavated teeth as Denisovan, whereas endogenous ancient-DNA recovery from the three bones failed.

Type HISTORICAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 25484

50 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 86 times: checked 0, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 86, shared 0. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9955 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

3 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:677b91ea-9fa0-8ed8-ba0f-27d37800896d

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study screened over 60,000 fragments and selected 76 for ZooMS and 17 for proteomic sequencing. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
7800896dNARROWS86e78bd6

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes8a9aaed8, e6896ba9, c1e20bd9

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The study screened over 60,000 fragments and selected 76 for ZooMS and 17 for proteomic sequencing. 34dec3e9

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. ec1fb409

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:677b91ea-9fa0-8ed8-ba0f-27d37800896d

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
25484APPENDED
25485ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
25490TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)