Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

HD 3167 b's dayside is cooler than the maximum expected for an airless world, providing evidence for an atmosphere.

Type CAUSAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21241 · qualifiers {"scope":"Inference described in coverage of the 2026 Astrophysical Journal Letters study."}

Referenced 88 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 54, shared 32. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Astronomy and space · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9601 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability LOW

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:6cad71e3-b384-851a-b84e-738008f4a1ae

Not yet independently audited.This assessment depends heavily on modeling choices.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from arxiv.org and phys.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Phys.org describes the cooler-than-maximum dayside as evidence for an atmosphere and explains the inference via reflective clouds. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly states that HD 3167 b is cooler than its expected maximum and presents this as strong evidence for an atmosphere.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
213a8a40ef085246

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes1eab6b4a

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports a greater-than-5-sigma deficit relative to a maximally hot bare-rock eclipse and interprets the resulting cooler dayside as best explained by an atmosphere. 14e1fc73

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 213a8a40

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 84c94bd0

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:6cad71e3-b384-851a-b84e-738008f4a1ae

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21241APPENDED
21242ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21251LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21259LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
23889TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)