Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study used 19 astrometric positions of S301 that outlined an ellipse on the sky and yielded a consistent orbit.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 22094

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 125 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 76, shared 47. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Astronomy and space · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:7e180953-f383-83f9-afe3-433d3f54f42e

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports 19 astrometric positions outlining a consistent elliptical orbit. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports 19 S301 astrometric positions outlining an ellipse on the sky and yielding a consistent orbit.; The primary paper directly reports the 19-position astrometric basis for the fitted orbit.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
8858a4518b33007c
a835f6e58b33007c

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes8b33007c, 64d1f32b, ee9007bf

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports 19 astrometric positions outlining a consistent elliptical orbit. 5b3138b5

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. 8858a451a835f6e5

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:7e180953-f383-83f9-afe3-433d3f54f42e

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
22094APPENDED
22095ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
22108LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22291LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24891TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)