Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The paper frames AQAGC evaluation as hybrid simulation under realistic NISQ conditions, not practical quantum advantage. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Hide calculation

Your view

Registered views

Evidence for

• The abstract directly describes a derived benchmark from four named datasets with standardized attack graphs of 50 to 5000 nodes.

  From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Directly supports derived construction, four datasets, standardization, and node range.

• The paper frames AQAGC evaluation as hybrid simulation under realistic NISQ conditions, not practical quantum advantage.

  From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Supports the evaluation context and scope limitation.

• The framework integrates VAQE, adaptive quantum-walk scheduling, and ERAM modules for the evaluated attack-graph exploration.

  From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  Supports that the benchmark was used to evaluate the named framework.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
9b28bd6f	NARROWS	15cc2012

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	d1e989f4, 6ddb453d, c22b7e28

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
25546	APPENDED
25547	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
25550	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "813e557d-3240-88af-93ee-84ab9b28bd6f",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "1bd0f2c6-a29f-8651-894f-5fa6d1e989f4",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "3f1d6c4a-db8e-86de-b6c9-564e16917d8c",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.540000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.540000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "4f851d54-8cd1-8d1e-8be8-48de6ddb453d",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "a290a842-b99d-858c-a0e1-f4ef6b613c06",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "b8a76b15-32bf-8ca4-9dd6-a793c22b7e28",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "eb3c68a8-4026-8064-9c83-18dc21f41961",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0477",
    "permissive": "0.9954",
    "conservative": "0.9477"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9843",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "4.140000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25551,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 3,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "1bd0f2c6-a29f-8651-894f-5fa6d1e989f4",
        "4f851d54-8cd1-8d1e-8be8-48de6ddb453d",
        "b8a76b15-32bf-8ca4-9dd6-a793c22b7e28"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "4.140000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}