Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Trump used the phrase "ban on the free press" while restating a reporter's question about what the ban would look like, not while announcing it.

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 5680

Referenced 113 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 69, shared 43. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Media · e82bf250

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 3 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:82da53c3-d4c1-8d05-93e7-cb4d74dfc14b

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Trump called his own action the ban on the free press when a reporter asked what it would look like. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt shows a reporter asking what the ban would look like, followed by Trump calling it the ban on the free press while describing its scope.

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
7ad566eaf45b01dd

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyes5f6217b4
opposing search doneyes7c05e43a
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesf45b01dd, 0aab6775

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Trump called his own action the ban on the free press when a reporter asked what it would look like. 3d8ba695

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 7ad566ea

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 7c05e43a

Review checks: 3 of 4. coverage:82da53c3-d4c1-8d05-93e7-cb4d74dfc14b

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
5680APPENDED
5681ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
5822LINK_EVIDENCEby e82bf250 (accepted)
8856TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)