Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Replacing the Ni electrodes with Ni81Fe19 or replacing titanium with chromium strongly suppressed the thermally induced voltage in the experiment.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 23146

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 92 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 66, shared 25. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Physics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:877d55eb-2e29-837b-afc8-b2edf82350ec

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from arxiv.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports strong signal suppression after substituting the electrode or titanium sample material. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports strong voltage suppression when Ni is replaced by Ni81Fe19 and when Ti is replaced by Cr.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
9a072aff2c5087ea

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes542e38ba, 2c5087ea

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports strong signal suppression after substituting the electrode or titanium sample material. 478efae8

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 9a072aff

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:877d55eb-2e29-837b-afc8-b2edf82350ec

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
23146APPENDED
23147ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23156LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24899TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)