Claim
The study estimated the PM2.5-productivity relationship using an instrumental-variable design combining air-quality data with bibliographic publication data.
Topics
Climate · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:8ac7891e-292f-8212-9c7b-f76ba74bd71d
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The primary study describes its instrumental-variable design and linked data sources. weight 1.800000 evidence
Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports an instrumental-variable design combining air-quality data with bibliographic publication data.
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “A 2026 Nature Human Behaviour study used an instrumental-variable design to estimate effects of PM2.5 air pollution on academic productivity in China.” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From Impacts of PM2.5 air pollution on high-skilled worker productivity in China Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Primary methods description.
-
From Impacts of PM2.5 air pollution on high-skilled worker productivity in China Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The excerpt states both the design and data sources.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
-
From Impacts of PM2.5 air pollution on high-skilled worker productivity in China Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Clarifies population, jurisdiction, unit of analysis, annual exposure/outcome framing, and linked-data provenance.
Suppressed as dependent
| Evidence | Group | Kept instead |
|---|---|---|
| 4dc01a95 | 00187130 |
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | df8d763b, 248ab2df, 00187130 |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The primary study describes its instrumental-variable design and linked data sources. 1a0ca00e
1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 4dc01a95
Qualifier: The instrumental-variable relationship is scoped to individual scholars in China, annual PM2.5 exposure, and publication records from specified databases; it is not a general all-worker or all-country productivity estimate. dde8d130
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:8ac7891e-292f-8212-9c7b-f76ba74bd71d
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 19614 | APPENDED | |
| 19615 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 19628 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 24491 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 25513 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |