Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

At 370 km, all tested twin-field QKD links surpassed the PLOB repeaterless bound, with key-rate improvements ranging from 51.5% to 251.4%.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21858

a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 117 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 74, shared 41. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Physics · 1efd24fe Security · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:8fa94ba2-50a6-8f8f-bb4d-cc61846bd5cb

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports bound exceedance across all tested links and the key-rate improvement range. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports all 20 links surpassing the PLOB bound at 370 km and 51.5%–251.4% key-rate improvement.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
b836fb08f91c62b6

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes5477ad8c, f0bfbbb4, f91c62b6

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The article’s results section repeats bound exceedance and the 51.5%–251.4% improvement range. e530ef46

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. b836fb08

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:8fa94ba2-50a6-8f8f-bb4d-cc61846bd5cb

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21858APPENDED
21859ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21872LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21990LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24874TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)