Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Trump said it was a very simple ban, that he did not want the outlets in his office or at the White House, that the ban would go as far as you can, and that he would love it if they straightened themselves out.

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 6018

44 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 100 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 97, shared 2. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Media · e82bf250 Government · e82bf250

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 3 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:9050e2ab-4221-8d47-a2ba-da95ed25db09

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Trump himself used the phrase ban on the free press when asked what the ban would look like. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly quotes Trump calling it a very simple ban, saying he did not want the outlets in his office or at the White House, that it would go as far as possible, and that he would welcome them straightening themselves out.

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Hide calculation

0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 3 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 2 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:d92870932d439267049409a7e82064edacaf0486cd321992443fe512325b2fb2

Last changed at entry seq 11146; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
8333b5e2 support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 1.800000 0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 1243bf8f)
1243bf8f support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 1.800000 1.800000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 1.800000 (the counted weights) = 1.800000 → probability 0.8581

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.7790 to 0.9121, a spread of 0.1331.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
497d021c1243bf8f

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyescd4efcc0
opposing search doneyes39dbf73c
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes8333b5e2, 1243bf8f

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Trump himself used the phrase ban on the free press when asked what the ban would look like. 9beeb025

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 497d021c

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 39dbf73c

Review checks: 3 of 4. coverage:9050e2ab-4221-8d47-a2ba-da95ed25db09

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
6018APPENDED
6019ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
6232LINK_EVIDENCEby e82bf250 (accepted)
8904TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "9050e2ab-4221-8d47-a2ba-da95ed25db09",
  "links": [
    {
      "kept": "d9d4a7f2-2103-8518-9ecb-67c01243bf8f",
      "link": "6b8d1285-ec78-8811-9407-56c48333b5e2",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "a5d0098c-ffb5-8a16-ab41-f090497d021c",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "d9d4a7f2-2103-8518-9ecb-67c01243bf8f",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "4f94c74a-5aca-858b-b5ef-0af99beeb025",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1331",
    "permissive": "0.9121",
    "conservative": "0.7790"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "TEXTUAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.8581",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "1.800000",
  "snapshot_seq": 11146,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.75",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "01a0c6b2-88e1-7025-ba56-0867cd4efcc0"
      ],
      "ok": true
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [
        "01a0c6b2-88cc-714c-8589-25e139dbf73c"
      ],
      "ok": true
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "6b8d1285-ec78-8811-9407-56c48333b5e2",
        "d9d4a7f2-2103-8518-9ecb-67c01243bf8f"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "1.800000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}