Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Trump named the New York Times and the Washington Post as potential future targets and said the White House would probably stop displaying those papers.

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 6022

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 127 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 93, shared 32. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Media · e82bf250

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 3 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:94b2aecf-d4f2-8384-8d57-0a70fd9f6b9b

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: AL.com reports Trump named both papers and said they probably would no longer be displayed, while clarifying they were not yet expelled. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt names The New York Times and Washington Post, calls them fake news, and says the White House will probably no longer display those papers.

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
56c0f69e1691929e

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyes187574e3
opposing search doneyes6067ee18
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes496b9c9e, 1691929e

Summary

Supported. The main support is: AL.com reports Trump named both papers and said they probably would no longer be displayed, while clarifying they were not yet expelled. 9ee9562e

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 56c0f69e

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 6067ee18

Review checks: 3 of 4. coverage:94b2aecf-d4f2-8384-8d57-0a70fd9f6b9b

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
6022APPENDED
6023ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
6234LINK_EVIDENCEby e82bf250 (accepted)
8916TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
11157LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)