Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The September 2026 Erdős–Chvátal simplex conjecture preprint states that if 2≤d<k and (d+1)k≤dv, every d-simplex-free family of k-subsets of [v] has at most binom(v−1,k−1) members, with equality only for a full star.

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 17805 · qualifiers {"translation":"Notation and theorem wording follow the arXiv abstract.","source_edition":"e59de2b5-85db-8734-aec3-bf336b31e6e2"}

32 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 73 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 55, shared 17. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Mathematics · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:953a34b6-8db0-8dbf-aac5-f57e18e28412

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from arxiv.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The arXiv abstract states the full-parameter theorem and its equality characterization. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted arXiv abstract directly states the full parameter range, binomial upper bound, and equality only for a full star.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
85242a116a3dbd53

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes71c813e0, 6a3dbd53

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The arXiv abstract states the full-parameter theorem and its equality characterization. 8ebbe3bc

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 85242a11

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:953a34b6-8db0-8dbf-aac5-f57e18e28412

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
17805APPENDED
17806ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
17811LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24454TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)