Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Geopolitics · 56fe4c61 Government · 56fe4c61

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted contradiction: The speaker denies saying Ukraine fed Trump false intelligence; he only inferred Ukrainians feared US leaks. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: Crouzet denied saying Ukraine sent false intelligence and said he inferred only that Ukrainians feared U.S.-side leaks.; The excerpt says the speaker did not say Ukraine sent false intelligence and only inferred that Ukrainians feared leaks on the American side, contradicting the claim's stated account.

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Contradicted to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “France and Ukraine fed Trump false intelligence to test whether he would leak it to Putin—and he did.” · 3 claims · 22 September 2026

Evidence for

None.

Evidence against

• Crouzet denied saying Ukraine sent false intelligence and said he inferred only that Ukrainians feared U.S.-side leaks.

  From Fact Check: French Channel LCI Did NOT Report Ukraine Sent False Strategic Info To US -- Clip Only Mentioned 'Leaks' To Moscow Read 2026-09-22 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted

  The viral claim appears to derive from Crouzet's LCI remarks; he explicitly denied saying Ukraine sent false intelligence.

• A Ukrainian military-intelligence source told Kyiv Post the alleged false-intelligence operation had no objective basis or real grounds.

  From FACT-CHECK: Did Ukraine Run Sting on US Intel to Catch Russia Leaks? Read 2026-09-22 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  Direct denial from a Ukrainian intelligence source, though the source is an interested party.

• The speaker denies saying Ukraine fed Trump false intelligence; he only inferred Ukrainians feared US leaks.

  From Fact Check: French Channel LCI Did NOT Report Ukraine Sent False Strategic Info To US -- Clip Only Mentioned 'Leaks' To Moscow Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The excerpt says the speaker did not say Ukraine sent false intelligence and only inferred that Ukrainians feared leaks on the American side, contradicting the claim's stated account.

  From Fact Check: French Channel LCI Did NOT Report Ukraine Sent False Strategic Info To US -- Clip Only Mentioned 'Leaks' To Moscow Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Qualifications

• The source attributes only an inference about Ukrainian fears of US leaks and explicitly denies saying Ukraine sent false intelligence.

  From Fact Check: French Channel LCI Did NOT Report Ukraine Sent False Strategic Info To US -- Clip Only Mentioned 'Leaks' To Moscow Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The passage limits the account to an inference about leak fears, not a documented deliberate test.

• A Ukrainian intelligence source says the alleged operation lacked objective basis or real grounds, without identifying an operation or timeframe.

  From FACT-CHECK: Did Ukraine Run Sting on US Intel to Catch Russia Leaks? Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The denial narrows the evidence and does not establish the claimed operation's population, timing, or baseline.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
e15ec300		4bb9905b
039d1e0c		4bb9905b

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	yes	3b3e8a98
opposing search done	yes	e319ea2b
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
6311	APPENDED
6312	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
6327	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
6329	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
7086	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
8330	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
9092	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)