Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the Brazilian Cerrado, open-air village populations consumed substantial maize, whereas contemporaneous rock-shelter populations had more diverse diets and little evidence of intensive maize use.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21306 · qualifiers {"scope":"Comparative isotope evidence from the 2026 study across Cerrado archaeological contexts."}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 87 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 66, shared 20. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Archaeology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

0 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 0 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:aa633af0-3bf5-8e14-b131-28ec493260ae

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 0 of 4 review checks have been done.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The isotope summary directly contrasts maize reliance in open-air villages with diverse diets in nearby rock shelters. weight 2.000000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The isotope summary directly contrasts maize reliance in open-air villages with diverse diets in nearby rock shelters. e62297ca

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:aa633af0-3bf5-8e14-b131-28ec493260ae

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21306APPENDED
21307ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21320LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24846TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)