Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The 176Lu+ comparison became statistically limited after approximately 200 hours of averaging, with measurement instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ².

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 23905 · qualifiers {"time_range":"Approximately 200 hours of averaging","denominator":"Measurement instability"}

Referenced 143 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 104, shared 38. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Physics · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:ac04f618-5274-85d5-bde1-b912c0cac787

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from arxiv.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports statistical limitation after about 200 hours and instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ². weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports statistical limitation after approximately 200 hours and measurement instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ².

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
c643952f79e6e2ea

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesd23ed1f4, 79e6e2ea

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports statistical limitation after about 200 hours and instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ². d3702f2f

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. c643952f

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:ac04f618-5274-85d5-bde1-b912c0cac787

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
23905APPENDED
23906ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23919LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24929TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)