Claim
The 176Lu+ comparison became statistically limited after approximately 200 hours of averaging, with measurement instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ².
Topics
Physics · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:ac04f618-5274-85d5-bde1-b912c0cac787
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from arxiv.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The abstract reports statistical limitation after about 200 hours and instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ². weight 2.000000 evidence
Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports statistical limitation after approximately 200 hours and measurement instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ².
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “A report on two independent 176Lu+ single-ion optical references gives sub-10⁻¹⁹ systematic uncertainties and a direct correlation-spectroscopy comparison...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From Optical clocks with accuracy validated at the 19th digit Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
-
From Optical clocks with accuracy validated at the 19th digit Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Time threshold, statistical limitation, and instability match.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
| Evidence | Group | Kept instead |
|---|---|---|
| c643952f | 79e6e2ea |
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | d23ed1f4, 79e6e2ea |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports statistical limitation after about 200 hours and instability of 4.8×10⁻¹⁶(τ/s)⁻¹ᐟ². d3702f2f
1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. c643952f
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:ac04f618-5274-85d5-bde1-b912c0cac787
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 23905 | APPENDED | |
| 23906 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 23919 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 24929 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |