Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Blundin said Alex Karp went on a Palantir rampage saying companies should “get some cojones and become an AI company or die.”

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 8422

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 115 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 1, viewed 75, shared 37. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Leans supported

Score: 0.6128 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:b7350684-01d2-8975-9094-841979193da2

Not yet independently audited.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Leans contradicted

Why?

Strongest counted support: The report attributes to Alex Karp a public warning for companies to become AI companies or die, with wording materially matching the quoted claim, though it does not use the phrase “Palantir rampage.” weight 0.459000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Contradicted.

Hide calculation

0.6128 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Leans supported · Review checks: 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 2 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:730bb13d34317b22317adbdeb4add89000127da37a96218f458c790f776a9f97

Last changed at entry seq 11898; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
57bd28af support relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.459000 0.459000
3d880104 qualify relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.459000 0.000000 (non directional)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 0.459000 (the counted weights) = 0.459000 → probability 0.6128

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.5796 to 0.6449, a spread of 0.0653.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
79193da2NARROWS406c9b5a

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Leans supported. The main support is: The report attributes to Alex Karp a public warning for companies to become AI companies or die, with wording materially matching the quoted claim, though it does not use the phrase “Palantir rampage.” 8e5306b8

Qualifier: Independent reporting confirms a heated Karp interview about rival AI companies but quotes different language and does not substantiate the specific “get some cojones and become an AI company or die” wording. 6d4851fb

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 581c4caf

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:b7350684-01d2-8975-9094-841979193da2

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
8422APPENDED
8423ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
11499LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
11897LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "b7350684-01d2-8975-9094-841979193da2",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "67fb419b-8f57-85bc-9e59-ff1b57bd28af",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "282ad090-49c6-8f13-ac95-c7fb8e5306b8",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.459000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "link": "70eda23c-9f1b-868b-8eb0-987a3d880104",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "99962e62-87dc-86d0-871f-0b536d4851fb",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0653",
    "permissive": "0.6449",
    "conservative": "0.5796"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "TEXTUAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.6128",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "0.459000",
  "snapshot_seq": 11898,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.00",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "LEANS_SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "0.459000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}