Claim

Emad Mostaque's Champion proposal allocates 10% of a local AI and robotics company's equity to residents under 21 and issues additional equity to children born later.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 5547

26 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 196 times: checked 3, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 108, shared 85. A count of attention, not evidence.

Revises Emad Mostaque put forward a Champion proposal in which every child owns equity in the robots at a nominal pre-money valuation. · reason: The proposal specifies equity in the locally owned Champion company, with 10% allocated to under-21 residents and annual issuance for children born later; 'every child owns equity in the robots' and a single nominal valuation obscure these terms.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9970 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

4 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:bdaf0f84-7059-8432-8eb2-052b9113cc3d

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from aisocratic.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Independent reporting describes the Champion proposal's 10% child-equity trust and annual 0.5% newborn-cohort allocation. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Hide calculation

0.9970 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 4 sources, 4 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:6ba81d45bc36f7768e208cf02948a6e81338919c44513316b1fa018766488782

Last changed at entry seq 15791; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
6118da72 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
18536bdc support	relevance STRONG 1.2 × observation EYEWITNESS 0.4 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.408000	0.408000
82756955 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
76a7f590 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 5.808000 (the counted weights) = 5.808000 → probability 0.9970

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.9831 to 0.9995, a spread of 0.0164.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“Emad Mostaque's Champion proposal allocates 10% of a local AI and robotics company's equity to residents under 21 and issues additional equity to children...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
“Emad Mostaque's Champion proposal allocates 10% of a local AI and robotics company's equity to residents under 21 and issues additional equity to children...” · 1 claim · 22 September 2026
“Emad Mostaque's Champion proposal allocates 10% of a local AI and robotics company's equity to residents under 21 and issues additional equity to children...” · 1 claim · 22 September 2026

Evidence for

Mostaque describes his own Champion proposal for children owning robot equity.

From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted

carried from link 07a4e4ac-3dc7-897c-9405-49cf93aab293 on the revision of claim 26780795-30b8-8d50-90be-cc6afa428644
Mostaque's organization defines a Champion as a locally owned intelligence utility and private company.

From Intelligent Internet | Infrastructure for the Intelligence Age Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The Champion plan allocates 10% of equity to residents under 21 and issues more equity for children born each year.

From Intelligent Internet | Infrastructure for the Intelligence Age Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Independent reporting describes the Champion proposal's 10% child-equity trust and annual 0.5% newborn-cohort allocation.

From Emad Mostaque pitches locally owned AI “Champions” founded at a $1 valuation Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

This independent report directly describes the equity allocation in the proposal and distinguishes it from an implemented company.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	82756955, 76a7f590

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Independent reporting describes the Champion proposal's 10% child-equity trust and annual 0.5% newborn-cohort allocation. 920fee5f

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:bdaf0f84-7059-8432-8eb2-052b9113cc3d

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
5547	APPENDED
5548	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
5549	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
5557	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
5564	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
15790	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "bdaf0f84-7059-8432-8eb2-052b9113cc3d",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "0896a502-f02f-80d8-8ea0-53c06118da72",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "8a58db5e-e90c-831b-9b82-6f46920fee5f",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "4fd65b5e-b0bc-8d6c-986c-896118536bdc",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "2d3fdd5c-8c68-809a-98a3-6d9912a8c706",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.408000",
      "relevance": "STRONG",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "EYEWITNESS",
      "source_type": "VIDEO",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.408000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "link": "6e014c2a-463e-84a3-9e83-7e3082756955",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "e0d39b62-8732-8060-a6d8-2180927171b1",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "ec69a46e-b1f2-880b-82c6-c3bb76a7f590",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "96ef02c8-d7aa-8fef-8b60-668135e3259e",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0164",
    "permissive": "0.9995",
    "conservative": "0.9831"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "OBSERVATIONAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9970",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "5.808000",
  "snapshot_seq": 15791,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 4,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "6e014c2a-463e-84a3-9e83-7e3082756955",
        "ec69a46e-b1f2-880b-82c6-c3bb76a7f590"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "5.808000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 4
}