Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The LHCb analysis reported an 8.7-sigma global-significance structure in the Ω0cπ+ mass spectrum and identified it as the doubly charmed baryon Ω+cc.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 23022 · qualifiers {"population":"LHCb upgraded-detector dataset; 6.3 fb−1 at 13.6 TeV.","time_range":"2024 proton-proton collision data."}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 90 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 61, shared 28. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Physics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:c8ea5047-cc73-83a0-a3b8-c5b4c8f53bfc

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from arxiv.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports an 8.7-sigma structure and identifies it as the doubly charmed baryon Omega-plus-cc. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage reports an 8.7-sigma global-significance peak in the Omega-c-zero-pi-plus spectrum and identifies it as Omega-plus-cc.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
1f97217cee862b21

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesa99a48e3, 60b8e624, ee862b21

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The analysis used 6.3 inverse femtobarns of 2024 proton-proton data at 13.6 TeV. 997bfc15

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 1f97217c

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:c8ea5047-cc73-83a0-a3b8-c5b4c8f53bfc

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
23022APPENDED
23023ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23036LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
23040LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25017TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)