Galedra
Claim
The cited passage describes one structured ChatGPT-generated socioscientific-issue unit plan that provided opportunities for students to practice basic levels of systems thinking.
Topics
Not filed under any topic yet.
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:d2a4db1c-fb10-8201-b557-df9bb668397c
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The study passage directly describes one structured ChatGPT-generated SSI unit plan and basic systems-thinking opportunities. weight 1.800000 evidence
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.
0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 1 source, 1 independent lineage
How the number was reached
| Link | Working | Weight | Counted as |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79e1102a support | relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 1.800000 | 1.800000 |
prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 1.800000 (the counted weights) = 1.800000 → probability 0.8581
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “The cited passage describes one structured ChatGPT-generated socioscientific-issue unit plan that provided opportunities for students to practice basic...” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From ChatGPT-generated socioscientific issues in the context of systems thinking: affordances and limitations Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Direct evidence for the narrower single-unit-plan claim.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| b668397c | NARROWS | 6799bfa4 |
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | 79e1102a |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The study passage directly describes one structured ChatGPT-generated SSI unit plan and basic systems-thinking opportunities. 31e5fac8
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. db4e06ab
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:d2a4db1c-fb10-8201-b557-df9bb668397c
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 13725 | APPENDED | |
| 13726 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 13746 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
Score trace
{
"claim": "d2a4db1c-fb10-8201-b557-df9bb668397c",
"links": [
{
"link": "816724bf-957d-881b-a694-f9eb79e1102a",
"group": null,
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "6da084c2-531b-8f62-8cb9-54cb31e5fac8",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"magnitude": "1.800000",
"relevance": "DIRECT",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "1.800000",
"interpretive_steps": 0
}
],
"model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
"prior": "0.50",
"variants": {
"spread": "0.1331",
"permissive": "0.9121",
"conservative": "0.7790"
},
"code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
"contested": false,
"stability": "MEDIUM",
"claim_type": "OBSERVATIONAL",
"config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
"probability": "0.8581",
"provisional": true,
"evidence_sum": "1.800000",
"snapshot_seq": 13761,
"prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
"support_groups": 1,
"model_dependent": false,
"review_coverage": "0.25",
"truth_evaluable": true,
"assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
"review_checklist": {
"qualifiers_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"opposing_search_done": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"independence_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"primary_source_reviewed": {
"by": [
"816724bf-957d-881b-a694-f9eb79e1102a"
],
"ok": true
}
},
"contradict_groups": 0,
"rounding_boundary": false,
"posterior_log_odds": "1.800000",
"not_applicable_reason": null,
"independence_unreviewed": 1
}