Claim
Two independent 176Lu+ single-ion optical references were reported with total systematic uncertainties of 1.1×10⁻¹⁹ and 1.4×10⁻¹⁹, and 9.6×10⁻²⁰ for their difference.
a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluableTopics
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:d81c50f4-123d-89ba-8fb5-2b7398dabd16
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from arxiv.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The abstract reports 1.1×10⁻¹⁹ and 1.4×10⁻¹⁹ individual systematic uncertainties and 9.6×10⁻²⁰ for the difference. weight 2.000000 evidence
Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports individual systematic uncertainties of 1.1×10⁻¹⁹ and 1.4×10⁻¹⁹, with 9.6×10⁻²⁰ for their difference.
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “A report on two independent 176Lu+ single-ion optical references gives sub-10⁻¹⁹ systematic uncertainties and a direct correlation-spectroscopy comparison...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From Optical clocks with accuracy validated at the 19th digit Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
-
From Optical clocks with accuracy validated at the 19th digit Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
| Evidence | Group | Kept instead |
|---|---|---|
| ff11e46f | 40d48dd7 |
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | 40d48dd7, 81c21289 |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports 1.1×10⁻¹⁹ and 1.4×10⁻¹⁹ individual systematic uncertainties and 9.6×10⁻²⁰ for the difference. 144fcff4
1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. ff11e46f
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:d81c50f4-123d-89ba-8fb5-2b7398dabd16
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 23897 | APPENDED | |
| 23898 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 23915 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 24923 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |