Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Geopolitics · 56fe4c61 Government · 56fe4c61

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted contradiction: The excerpt states that there have been no confirmed reports of the United States passing intelligence to Russia, which does not support the claim that Trump leaked intelligence to Putin. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage says there have been no confirmed reports of the US passing intelligence to Russia.; Kyiv Post reported no confirmed cases of the United States passing intelligence to Russia.

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Contradicted to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “France and Ukraine fed Trump false intelligence to test whether he would leak it to Putin—and he did.” · 3 claims · 22 September 2026

Evidence for

None.

Evidence against

• Kyiv Post reported no confirmed cases of the United States passing intelligence to Russia.

  From FACT-CHECK: Did Ukraine Run Sting on US Intel to Catch Russia Leaks? Read 2026-09-22 Relevance WEAK Steps 1 Counted

  Absence of confirmed reporting does not prove no leak occurred, but it undercuts the categorical viral assertion.

• The passage says there have been no confirmed reports of the US passing intelligence to Russia.

  From FACT-CHECK: Did Ukraine Run Sting on US Intel to Catch Russia Leaks? Read 2026-09-22 Relevance WEAK Steps 0 Counted

  Absence of confirmed reports weighs against the claimed leak without disproving it.

• The excerpt states that there have been no confirmed reports of the United States passing intelligence to Russia, which does not support the claim that Trump leaked intelligence to Putin.

  From FACT-CHECK: Did Ukraine Run Sting on US Intel to Catch Russia Leaks? Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Qualifications

• Crouzet denied saying Ukraine sent false intelligence and said he inferred only that Ukrainians feared U.S.-side leaks.

  From Fact Check: French Channel LCI Did NOT Report Ukraine Sent False Strategic Info To US -- Clip Only Mentioned 'Leaks' To Moscow Read 2026-09-22 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

  Crouzet described Ukrainian fears of possible leaks, not proof that Trump leaked planted information to Putin.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
889b2717		294fa55f
bbc6c6f8		294fa55f

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	yes	555837e9
opposing search done	yes	84422b6d
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
6315	APPENDED
6316	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
6331	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
6335	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)
6516	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
8110	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)