Claim
The reported PANXEON sensitivity and false-positive rates were measured in a testing cohort containing separate low-risk and high-risk control groups.
a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluableTopics
Not filed under any topic yet.
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:e3563849-0001-824d-889e-6e5e68c78451
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The same report gives the combined assay’s 86.8% stage I–II sensitivity in the testing cohort. weight 1.800000 evidence
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.
0.9955 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 4 sources, 3 independent lineages
How the number was reached
| Link | Working | Weight | Counted as |
|---|---|---|---|
| e5e165ef support | relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 1.800000 | 1.800000 |
| 325e0295 support | relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 1.800000 | 1.800000 |
| d49000c7 qualify | relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 0.459000 | 0.000000 (non directional) |
| af6fb934 support | relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 | 1.800000 | 1.800000 |
prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 5.400000 (the counted weights) = 5.400000 → probability 0.9955
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “The reported PANXEON sensitivity and false-positive rates were measured in a testing cohort containing separate low-risk and high-risk control groups.” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From Liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Direct evidence for the new narrowed quantitative claim.
-
From PANXEON Blood Test Detects Early Pancreatic Cancer Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
-
From PANXEON Blood Test Detects Early Pancreatic Cancer Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
-
From PANXEON Blood Test Detects Early Pancreatic Cancer Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| 68c78451 | NARROWS | ff28a421 |
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | 325e0295 |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The same report gives the combined assay’s 86.8% stage I–II sensitivity in the testing cohort. 9176f0da
Qualifier: The report identifies the results as research-cohort performance rather than evidence of population-screening mortality benefit. 320b2f3d
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 9a134d5d
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:e3563849-0001-824d-889e-6e5e68c78451
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 14215 | APPENDED | |
| 14216 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 14224 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 14273 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
Score trace
{
"claim": "e3563849-0001-824d-889e-6e5e68c78451",
"links": [
{
"link": "86d7603a-4708-81f5-9303-d1dbe5e165ef",
"group": null,
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "21d48da7-7bcd-8fa0-8aee-8a8d9176f0da",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"magnitude": "1.800000",
"relevance": "DIRECT",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "1.800000",
"interpretive_steps": 0
},
{
"link": "8cda3b31-9c5e-8dca-baba-052a325e0295",
"group": null,
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "c4c6ab6d-0505-8252-88e0-cba79a1d2b4a",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"magnitude": "1.800000",
"relevance": "DIRECT",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "1.800000",
"interpretive_steps": 0
},
{
"link": "9f4c651b-c1c1-8095-b4af-9fb2d49000c7",
"group": null,
"reason": "non_directional",
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "f7720acc-d992-883b-96bb-9044320b2f3d",
"direction": "QUALIFY",
"magnitude": "0.459000",
"relevance": "MODERATE",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "0.000000",
"interpretive_steps": 1
},
{
"link": "df9c03ba-c340-861c-b5df-5fa5af6fb934",
"group": null,
"edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
"evidence": "69b4590e-9e3e-8119-939d-df2efb1f119d",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"magnitude": "1.800000",
"relevance": "DIRECT",
"extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
"provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
"observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
"authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
"audit_confirmed": false,
"effective_weight": "1.800000",
"interpretive_steps": 0
}
],
"model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
"prior": "0.50",
"variants": {
"spread": "0.0214",
"permissive": "0.9991",
"conservative": "0.9777"
},
"code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
"contested": false,
"stability": "HIGH",
"claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
"config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
"probability": "0.9955",
"provisional": true,
"evidence_sum": "5.400000",
"snapshot_seq": 14274,
"prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
"support_groups": 3,
"model_dependent": false,
"review_coverage": "0.25",
"truth_evaluable": true,
"assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
"review_checklist": {
"qualifiers_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"opposing_search_done": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"independence_reviewed": {
"by": [],
"ok": false
},
"primary_source_reviewed": {
"by": [
"8cda3b31-9c5e-8dca-baba-052a325e0295"
],
"ok": true
}
},
"contradict_groups": 0,
"rounding_boundary": false,
"posterior_log_odds": "5.400000",
"not_applicable_reason": null,
"independence_unreviewed": 4
}