The evidence is mixed. Don't repeat this as settled.
“In a Brazilian Amazon randomized trial, the flexible payment contract saved slightly more forest, while the fixed zero-deforestation contract had a higher benefit-cost ratio.”
Say instead: The counted passage gives the contract comparison but omits the trial's time range, sample population, denominator, and Brazilian-randomized-study context.
3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only
Unresolved · 0.5000 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · review checks 1 of 4 · provisional until audited. The number is model-conditional, not a share of truth.
Checked in Galedra: score 0.50, evidence mixed · not yet reviewed by anyone else
“In a Brazilian Amazon randomized trial, the flexible payment contract saved slightly more forest, while the fixed zero-deforestation contract had a higher benefit-cost ratio.”
https://galedra.org/claims/e9f2864e-92ad-8728-a3a9-effadb808efb/card
Galedra
