Claim

The 52% figure is adjusted observational effectiveness from a pooled test-negative case-control study of hospitalized acute-gastroenteritis children, using rotavirus-positive cases rather than a direct infection-prevention efficacy endpoint.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 25345

27 words; atomic claims are usually under 25

Referenced 91 times: checked 0, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 91, shared 0. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:f5f431a3-cfd0-8487-9a07-bd2a29a004f6

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary passage supports an adjusted effectiveness estimate against rotavirus-gastroenteritis hospitalization in a hospitalized test-negative analysis. weight 2.000000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Evidence for

The primary passage supports an adjusted effectiveness estimate against rotavirus-gastroenteritis hospitalization in a hospitalized test-negative analysis.

From Pooled Indian test-negative case-control analysis of ROTASIIL effectiveness Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The source directly supports the narrowed observational design and hospitalization endpoint.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
29a004f6	NARROWS	7d17b7e5

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	736ed66f

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary passage supports an adjusted effectiveness estimate against rotavirus-gastroenteritis hospitalization in a hospitalized test-negative analysis. a7b9f79c

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. ec564dd6

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:f5f431a3-cfd0-8487-9a07-bd2a29a004f6

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
25345	APPENDED
25346	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
25349	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)