Claim

The study evaluated its attack-graph framework on a derived benchmark spanning four intrusion-detection datasets and graph sizes from 50 to 5000 nodes.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 20391

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 144 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 1, viewed 112, shared 29. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Security · 1efd24fe Statistics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 5 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:f741ab20-e161-875c-b31b-574215cc2012

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Related: NARROWS incoming: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study directly reports the benchmark datasets and graph-size range. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly identifies four intrusion-detection datasets and standardized attack graphs containing 50 to 5000 nodes.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Hide calculation

0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 5 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:16808fda3a30e51bdb720feefa16eb76071b9e3b2a16ad32214e3f7e61886d2d

Last changed at entry seq 25547; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
c2f19497 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
2c7ab6d2 qualify	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DATASET_RESULT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (non directional)
ea245fbe qualify	relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.540000	0.000000 (non directional)
342865eb support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DATASET_RESULT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
3c253f52 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DATASET_RESULT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 342865eb)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 3.600000 (the counted weights) = 3.600000 → probability 0.9734

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.9255 to 0.9908, a spread of 0.0653.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“The study evaluated its attack-graph framework on a derived benchmark spanning four intrusion-detection datasets and graph sizes from 50 to 5000 nodes.” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
“A primary cybersecurity study proposed and evaluated a hybrid quantum-walk-inspired compiler for attack-graph exploration and risk attribution.” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The primary study reports its benchmark datasets and graph-size range.

From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Primary benchmark description.
The primary study directly reports the benchmark datasets and graph-size range.

From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Additional directly relevant passage for the newly created benchmark claim.
The excerpt directly identifies four intrusion-detection datasets and standardized attack graphs containing 50 to 5000 nodes.

From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

The benchmark was derived from four named intrusion-detection datasets and consisted of standardized attack graphs ranging from 50 to 5000 nodes.

From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Clarifies derived benchmark construction, dataset denominator, and graph-size range.
The framework used hybrid simulation under NISQ conditions rather than claiming practical quantum computational advantage.

From Adaptive quantum-walk-inspired attack graph compiler for vulnerability-aware exploration and explainable cybersecurity attack path prioritization Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

Adds the hybrid-simulation evaluation context.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
9b8784b4		342865eb

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
9b28bd6f	NARROWS	15cc2012

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	c2f19497, 2c7ab6d2, ea245fbe, 342865eb, 3c253f52

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study directly reports the benchmark datasets and graph-size range. dfe4cdcc

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 9b8784b4

Qualifier: The benchmark was derived from four named intrusion-detection datasets and consisted of standardized attack graphs ranging from 50 to 5000 nodes. ed96fc49

Qualifier: The framework used hybrid simulation under NISQ conditions rather than claiming practical quantum computational advantage. 455c2a67

A narrower version of this claim is supported. 9b28bd6f

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:f741ab20-e161-875c-b31b-574215cc2012

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
20391	APPENDED
20392	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20407	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20433	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24517	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25546	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "f741ab20-e161-875c-b31b-574215cc2012",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "2e2a57a7-5ed5-8b05-8314-67fac2f19497",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "5d0b9dc1-8539-8ec1-8918-b220dfe4cdcc",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "3e728e30-2512-81e7-bef4-be222c7ab6d2",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "13dff2c3-1701-834a-96a8-7f7eed96fc49",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "4313e8cf-9a91-8d42-9746-dbffea245fbe",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "feaec033-8070-81ae-9ea4-d1f7455c2a67",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "0.540000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "79d75679-45bf-8aa2-9008-6859342865eb",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "3ac3fac4-2cc2-86ff-9499-46c13beb7a38",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "79d75679-45bf-8aa2-9008-6859342865eb",
      "link": "85354716-223a-8465-9a9b-6ea03c253f52",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "fab8cafe-c6b2-8ea4-8299-0ad49b8784b4",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0653",
    "permissive": "0.9908",
    "conservative": "0.9255"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9734",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "3.600000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25547,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "2e2a57a7-5ed5-8b05-8314-67fac2f19497",
        "3e728e30-2512-81e7-bef4-be222c7ab6d2",
        "4313e8cf-9a91-8d42-9746-dbffea245fbe",
        "79d75679-45bf-8aa2-9008-6859342865eb",
        "85354716-223a-8465-9a9b-6ea03c253f52"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "3.600000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 5
}