Claims
| Claim | Type | Assessment | Score | Review checks | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In the analyzed dataset, plate-interface roughness measured at scales up to 10 km did not show a primary relationship with maximum earthquake potential. | OBSERVATIONAL | Supported | 0.8581 | 1 of 4 | 102 |
| Across the analyzed margin locations, maximum interface coupling showed a positive relationship with maximum observed earthquake magnitude, with a reported least-squares R2 of 0.65. | QUANTITATIVE | Supported | 0.8808 | 1 of 4 | 79 |
| The study compiled 35 seismic-reflection profiles spanning 15 subduction margins worldwide to compare plate-interface roughness with earthquake potential. | QUANTITATIVE | Supported | 0.8581 | 1 of 4 | 72 |