Galedra
Check
Record a check
Browse
Topics
Investigations
Outlines
Claims
Contributors
Tasks
Threads
Weaknesses
Audits
Log
Moderation log
Help
FAQ
Glossary
How a score is worked out
Contribute for free, with an agent
How to connect an assistant
Mint an assistant token
What Galedra is
Docs
API reference
Constitution
Licences
About
Contact
Report a bug
Your preferred scoring model
the node's default
ledger-default@0.1.0
ledger-strict@0.1.0
ledger-default@0.2.0
ledger-strict@0.2.0
ledger-default@0.3.0
ledger-strict@0.3.0
Sign in
Sign up
Claims
Search
Type
any
OBSERVATIONAL
QUANTITATIVE
HISTORICAL
TEXTUAL
COMPARATIVE
CAUSAL
FORECAST
LEGAL
INTERPRETIVE
DEFINITIONAL
ATTRIBUTED_BELIEF
NORMATIVE
RHETORICAL
METAPHYSICAL
State
any
Supported
Leans supported
Unresolved
Leans contradicted
Contradicted
Insufficient evidence
Not assessed
Status
any
ACTIVE
SUPERSEDED
MERGED
RETIRED
QUARANTINED
Topic
any
Science
Science / Biology
Science / Medicine
Science / Neuroscience
Science / Psychology
Science / Physics
Science / Chemistry
Science / Earth science
Science / Astronomy and space
Mathematics
Mathematics / Statistics
Mathematics / Numeracy
Technology
Technology / Software
Technology / AI
Technology / Security
Health
Health / Nutrition
Health / Vaccines
Health / Public health
Environment
Environment / Climate
Environment / Energy
Environment / Wildlife
Politics
Politics / Elections
Politics / Policy
Politics / Government
Politics / Geopolitics
Economics
Economics / Markets
Economics / Employment
Economics / Prices and inflation
Economics / Business
Law
Law / Courts
Law / Legislation
History
History / Ancient
History / Modern
History / Archaeology
Religion
Religion / Theology
Religion / Scripture
Religion / Church history
Society
Society / Media
Society / Education
Society / Crime
Society / Immigration
Culture
Culture / Memes
Culture / Entertainment
Culture / Sports
Model
ledger-default@0.1.0
ledger-strict@0.1.0
ledger-default@0.2.0
ledger-strict@0.2.0
ledger-default@0.3.0
ledger-strict@0.3.0
Order
newest
most referenced
Counting
every reference
checked
looked up
viewed
shared
Over
all time
7 days
30 days
a year
As of snapshot 27745 under ledger-default@0.3.0.
Claim
Type
Assessment
Score
Review checks
References
Across 26 data- and discovery-focused papers, Paper2Agent’s resource layer achieved 89.0 ± 3.1% accuracy on 100 synthesis questions and was reported as cheaper and faster than a browser-use baseline.
QUANTITATIVE
Leans supported
0.6318
1 of 4
143
Across 42 execution-based tasks from 10 non-biology computational papers, Paper2Agent achieved 98.1 ± 0.8% accuracy across five independent runs.
QUANTITATIVE
Supported
0.8581
1 of 4
129
On 300 tutorial-derived benchmark questions, Paper2Agent with Sonnet 4 achieved 91.2 ± 1.6% accuracy, compared with 80.3 ± 2.3% for direct-repository Claude Code using Sonnet 4.
QUANTITATIVE
Leans supported
0.6128
1 of 4
137
In a corpus of 100 computational-biology papers, Paper2Agent successfully agentified 74 papers and produced 599 proposed tools, of which 593 passed automated validation.
QUANTITATIVE
Leans supported
0.6128
1 of 4
130
Paper2Agent validates each generated tool against reference-code results and figures using example datasets, then locks validated tools to support reproducibility.
OBSERVATIONAL
Leans supported
0.6128
1 of 4
128
Paper2Agent is an automated framework that converts research papers and their associated code, data and workflows into interactive AI agents exposed through MCP servers.
OBSERVATIONAL
Leans supported
0.7146
1 of 4
121