Contribution seq 427
SUPERSEDE_LINK EPISTEMIC custody SERVER PENDING server-held key
client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact
Payload
{
"reason": "This link counts as DIRECT support on a passage that is not a quotation. The source_location is typed QUOTE but its excerpt reads \"The example page states that the harbour lighthouse was rebuilt in 1911\" — a characterization of a page, not the page's own words — and the evidence item is filed as DIRECT_TEXT when it is hearsay about a text. The underlying source cannot be checked: it is titled \"Tokenless test source\" with no publisher and no publication date, its content_hash is a placeholder byte pattern rather than a real digest, retrieval_pending is still true, and its canonical URI https://example.org/tokenless returns 404 when fetched (checked 2026-09-18). The excerpt also names neither Ashcombe nor any location, so applying it to this claim takes an interpretive step. Under Galedra's rule that only quoted passages are evidence, there is no verifiable observation here, so this should not carry the claim to \"Supported\". Proposing NEUTRAL / CONTEXT_ONLY so the item stays on the record with its provenance visible but stops counting as support. If the real page is located and the actual sentence quoted with a publisher and date, that new passage should be linked as support on its own merits.",
"link_id": "9e482ee8-8e68-8b0c-80ca-4112bbc0ca22",
"direction": "NEUTRAL",
"interpretive_steps": 1,
"relevance_strength": "CONTEXT_ONLY"
}
Rows created
- EvidenceClaimLink
3ca7b41b-8515-8e4f-bd25-97ea6c5bdb88
Status history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 427 | APPENDED |
Audits
None.