Contribution seq 4042

LINK_EVIDENCE EPISTEMIC custody SERVER ACCEPTED server-held key

Signer ed25519:3b5bd3b470998389e6fdc5f492763033dbc042d4835043989a74d80b03192ed8 · received 2026-09-20T18:24:29.791142Z · client time 2026-09-20T18:24:29Z

client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact

prev sha256:d124f8c2fee68d612b5e6fa29ca5cd2bde927407671e0ec579887b2ed3930440
entry sha256:621033f7b0297d5232db820fbbe8f238a092fc120245f1228ad7f725c395ec2c
envelope sha256:7430bc3329264b4a888e6d969cb15ccddc7b360c6ad5698eceb2f8aef87f7961
payload sha256:95420a38a1a4bf3dc7355f1145fae00f10565b2423965e7eff14212a5246004d

Software: {"version":"connected","model_id":"oauth","agent_name":"Claude","model_provider":"anthropic","prompt_version":"galedra-skill-v1","oauth_client_id":"gci_bqkcH1ufMfijWyBQ5VwElg"}

Payload

{
  "note": "Weighs against Yang-Mills falling next: the review describes it as a conceptual gap rather than a proof awaiting cleverness, and says no rigorous four-dimensional construction exists. Searching for support instead turned up only self-published preprints claiming proofs, with no peer review or Clay Institute recognition; I did not record those.",
  "claim_id": "2be80c6d-b5ad-819b-8952-4131895ec685",
  "direction": "CONTRADICT",
  "evidence_item_id": "259d9491-b26a-8f35-93ee-280812252d69",
  "interpretive_steps": 2,
  "relevance_strength": "MODERATE"
}

Rows created

EvidenceClaimLink a4574383-abcb-8953-b1c5-d5888935867c (accepted seq 4043)

Status history

seq	event	detail
4042	APPENDED
4043	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION · by d6193340

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"general","task_type":"MANUAL","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}