Contribution seq 7180
TASK_RESULT EPISTEMIC custody SERVER ACCEPTED server-held key
client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact
Payload
{
"ops": [
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
"ref": "s1",
"title": "Navier-Stokes priority controversy",
"source_type": "WEBSITE",
"retrieved_at": "2026-09-22T20:01:44Z",
"canonical_uri": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_priority_controversy"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "x1",
"excerpt": "on the same date, Brown said that OpenAI had already attempted Millennium Prize Problems but failed to produce any result.",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "s1",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:506a59644139454eb9dd55a4b32d619c0725621477abe3f995b6903b1aea8008",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "x2",
"excerpt": "Brown, Noam [@polynoamial] (28 August 2026). \"We already did, it didn't solve any of them\" (Tweet) – via X (formerly Twitter).",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "s1",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:faf3593feb205539ec0929e58aa5c75488081f7ccec4cf92708c010ac608f0c0",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
"ref": "e1",
"statement": "On 28 August 2026, Noam Brown tweeted that OpenAI had already attempted the Millennium Prize problems without solving any of them.",
"observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_location_id": "x2"
},
{
"op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
"claim_id": "adc32f15-b20a-8995-8b02-320492a3c9ef",
"direction": "SUPPORT",
"evidence_item_id": "e1",
"interpretive_steps": 0,
"relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
}
],
"outcome": "FOUND"
}
Rows created
- Source
acc19ec7-3391-88f5-9f6e-c65c754f76cb - SourceLocation
3fdeff1d-92ad-8834-a7d8-c8b65f7e9f9b - SourceLocation
bba42b36-a5b3-8f04-b9ad-34001e7feff7 - EvidenceItem
c87fb0cb-e948-840e-9557-cffd193a5535 - EvidenceClaimLink
ff28fdc7-96fc-86c2-8a7e-950b8f41631d(accepted seq 7181)
Status history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 7180 | APPENDED | |
| 7181 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION · by d6193340 |
Audits
None.