Contribution seq 7339

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
      "ref": "s1",
      "title": "The Simulated Universe Hypothesis",
      "source_type": "WEBSITE",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-22T21:20:00Z",
      "canonical_uri": "http://theeconreview.com/2019/04/23/the-simulated-universe-hypothesis/"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
      "ref": "s2",
      "title": "Simulation Argument",
      "source_type": "WEBSITE",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-22T21:20:00Z",
      "canonical_uri": "https://www.lesswrong.com/w/simulation-argument"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "x1",
      "excerpt": "Musk was not the first to propose the Simulated Universe Hypothesis. Some argue that Rene Descartes, in the 1600's, proposed ideas that could be branched under this hypothesis, but it was only in 2003, when Swedish Oxford University Professor Nick Bostrom wrote a paper 'Are you Living in a Computer Simulation?' that we saw a formally explicated version of the theory.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "s1",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:1b1f8f849debb3d663db1f3d3624585f7b0b36b39de426b25750d4d595165138",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "x2",
      "excerpt": "The Simulation argument is an argument for the simulation hypothesis, which states we are living in a simulation. The concept was popularized in 2003 by Nick Bostrom's paper 'Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?' Philosophical Quarterly (2003) Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243-255.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "s2",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:e24137dc03fce519a36069c5311ee435a939ffa2a9df5359e685c9abfee2749a",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "e1",
      "statement": "Bostrom's 2003 paper gave the formally explicated version of the simulation hypothesis.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "x1"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "e2",
      "statement": "Bostrom's 2003 paper popularized and formally argued the simulation hypothesis.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "x2"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "Explicitly says the formal explication came from Bostrom's 2003 paper.",
      "claim_id": "e998df5e-a138-894e-94df-188565b1d049",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "evidence_item_id": "e1",
      "interpretive_steps": 1,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "Dates Bostrom's canonical paper to 2003 in Philosophical Quarterly.",
      "claim_id": "e998df5e-a138-894e-94df-188565b1d049",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "evidence_item_id": "e2",
      "interpretive_steps": 1,
      "relevance_strength": "STRONG"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "FOUND",
  "searched": "{\"summary\" => \"Searched web for Bostrom 2003 simulation argument paper; read The Economics Review article and LessWrong simulation argument page in full; both date the formal paper to 2003.\"}"
}

Rows created

• Source cb914b8d-2621-8592-a2db-c4b7514d1cbd
• Source a3ea43ac-92ff-899e-964c-22130bbd5a09
• SourceLocation dc3e054f-b76f-80cc-a8a6-be237acf96bc
• SourceLocation 717f523a-cabc-885f-b69e-ffa19c9e9551
• EvidenceItem bca6409a-b564-8f9e-8f90-54ad619ded2d
• EvidenceItem 08af0b72-5cdf-8ba8-adfa-edd8baef50be
• EvidenceClaimLink 2be2cf0f-08ab-8b29-8f02-9cafb8ce3817 (accepted seq 7340)
• EvidenceClaimLink 05e80671-9a38-8d2f-a0ac-1c63bf713eaa (accepted seq 7340)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"science","task_type":"OPPOSING_EVIDENCE_SEARCH","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}