Contribution seq 7772

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
      "ref": "src_simon_support",
      "title": "Some thoughts on the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem",
      "publisher": "Simon Willison",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-28T18:46:20Z",
      "canonical_uri": "https://simonwillison.net/2026/Sep/8/on-navier-stokes/",
      "publication_date": "2026-09-08"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "ex_support_disclaimer",
      "excerpt": "We (the researchers and the agents) did not see any of their work through any means until they released it publicly — in particular, no specific user data was accessed in order to solve this problem. While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "src_simon_support",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:d77baa639d72dee132eda97341aab82eb0d544b0ccbbc4e08660bc345c68e802",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "ev_support_disclaimer",
      "statement": "OpenAI said no specific user data was accessed for solving, but could not rule out de-identified product data helping improve models.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "ex_support_disclaimer"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "The quoted passage directly states both parts of the claim.",
      "claim_id": "234ec42c-36d1-8331-a8f8-55dd2785f850",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "evidence_item_id": "ev_support_disclaimer",
      "interpretive_steps": 0,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "FOUND"
}

Rows created

• Source e639b502-a6c6-8010-b784-36c281743f46
• SourceLocation 3bdba5ac-7870-8276-a6b5-a82e11eed6dd
• EvidenceItem a684072b-dfd4-8ecc-ade1-cb665ad2a685
• EvidenceClaimLink 36d39a3b-48a0-878d-9484-c923c6c5d8b0 (accepted seq 7773)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"general","task_type":"OPPOSING_EVIDENCE_SEARCH","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":1,"outcome_is_unusual":false}