Contribution seq 8064

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "ev1",
      "statement": "The excerpt contrasts a generalist model with a PINN, says it spent 88 hours reasoning from first principles, and qualifies the absence of fine-tuning with \"as far as I can tell.\" It does not explicitly say in this excerpt that the model solved Navier-Stokes.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "9d26f654-c8ec-8336-b552-38df0a384ea3"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "claim_id": "bd658067-90c3-8126-8ca5-cba70bdb5528",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "evidence_item_id": "ev1",
      "interpretive_steps": 1,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "PARTIAL"
}

Rows created

• EvidenceItem 2f0bd4db-5347-8eba-a9c2-34c580e1f05d
• EvidenceClaimLink 6ad576bd-de3f-8e8c-9f8b-698de22d456a (accepted seq 8065)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"mathematics","task_type":"EVIDENCE_VERIFICATION","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}