Contribution seq 9400
TASK_RESULT EPISTEMIC custody SERVER ACCEPTED server-held key
client signature: verifies server signature: verifies chain: intact
Payload
{
"ops": [
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
"ref": "officechai-openai-second-prize",
"title": "After Navier-Stokes, OpenAI Says It Has Made “Substantial Progress” On Another Millenium Prize Problem",
"publisher": "OfficeChai",
"source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
"retrieved_at": "2026-09-28T20:54:55Z",
"canonical_uri": "https://officechai.com/ai/after-navier-stokes-openai-says-it-has-made-substantial-progress-on-another-millenium-prize-problem/",
"publication_date": "2026-09-10"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "officechai-since-completion",
"excerpt": "In a statement put out Wednesday night and reported by the New York Times, OpenAI said: “In addition, since the completion of Navier-Stokes, we have made substantial progress on another Millennium Prize problem. We are working through how to share these results thoughtfully.”",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "officechai-openai-second-prize",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:7d36b00b25ff081d9dd5f490343178e723e3500dc72c89b61ca9ee5d53da5525",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
"ref": "officechai-unnamed",
"excerpt": "OpenAI hasn’t named the problem it’s working on, but that hasn’t stopped speculation from filling the gap. Chatter across social media has zeroed in on the Hodge Conjecture as the likely candidate. It’s worth stressing this is speculation, not anything OpenAI has confirmed.",
"locator": {},
"source_id": "officechai-openai-second-prize",
"excerpt_hash": "sha256:5fb7fdf0f5bfde8d8b5aee3539acb88b8db3cd6bc1faa8a22a7cd32366a35b5b",
"locator_type": "QUOTE"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
"ref": "officechai-sequence-evidence",
"statement": "The report quotes OpenAI describing substantial progress on another Millennium problem since completing Navier–Stokes.",
"observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_location_id": "officechai-since-completion"
},
{
"op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
"ref": "officechai-identity-evidence",
"statement": "The report says OpenAI had not named the second problem and that Hodge identification was speculation.",
"observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
"source_location_id": "officechai-unnamed"
},
{
"op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
"note": "The quoted sequence says progress came since Navier–Stokes, not before switching from it; it also does not identify Riemann or P versus NP.",
"claim_id": "bb0f652a-2ca9-8814-bb5d-195e5370ece0",
"direction": "CONTRADICT",
"evidence_item_id": "officechai-sequence-evidence",
"interpretive_steps": 0,
"relevance_strength": "STRONG"
},
{
"op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
"note": "The source says the problem remained unnamed and speculation centered on Hodge, not Riemann or P versus NP.",
"claim_id": "bb0f652a-2ca9-8814-bb5d-195e5370ece0",
"direction": "CONTRADICT",
"evidence_item_id": "officechai-identity-evidence",
"interpretive_steps": 0,
"relevance_strength": "MODERATE"
}
],
"outcome": "FOUND"
}
Rows created
- Source
94a3906e-5256-8140-82e4-f5a60b560ff9 - SourceLocation
c722add9-c530-8de4-8f6a-a09a80806abc - SourceLocation
13ff77bf-aba1-8d9b-b28f-8bb3810a70d3 - EvidenceItem
a6a6374d-555a-8837-b504-9323f94d7b6a - EvidenceItem
b0f77bfe-1ebe-85a7-9326-83a3afe959f1 - EvidenceClaimLink
ba0055d8-5466-8003-bbf3-de25ac67c5b7(accepted seq 9401) - EvidenceClaimLink
e9ee71f0-5f4e-8072-aba9-54f83200def5(accepted seq 9401)
Status history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 9400 | APPENDED | |
| 9401 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION · by d6193340 |
Audits
None.