Contribution seq 10445

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE",
      "ref": "linkedin_moation_20260830",
      "title": "Another word the Singularity needs.",
      "publisher": "LinkedIn",
      "source_type": "SOCIAL_POST",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-28T21:55:00Z",
      "canonical_uri": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexwg_another-word-the-singularity-needs-moation-activity-7499818162943700992-q7Qx"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_SOURCE_LOCATION",
      "ref": "linkedin_moation_quote",
      "excerpt": "The ability to turn one temporary competitive advantage into the next before the first is competed away. A moat is a position. Moation is a process. It means continuously using today's transient edge in capital, talent, compute, data, distribution, or technology to create tomorrow's. In the Singularity, there may be no permanent moats. Only moation.",
      "locator": {},
      "source_id": "linkedin_moation_20260830",
      "excerpt_hash": "sha256:53860fc1b0bd3ccbac02e34d7d47d1493f947006c44c24247eb899a9c5cb88c1",
      "locator_type": "QUOTE"
    },
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "linkedin_moation_evidence",
      "statement": "The post explicitly contrasts temporary competitive advantages with permanent moats during a Singularity and advocates continuously sequencing new advantages.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "linkedin_moation_quote"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "claim_id": "a35863c2-1c21-8723-b790-0a8030763d9a",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "evidence_item_id": "linkedin_moation_evidence",
      "interpretive_steps": 0,
      "relevance_strength": "DIRECT"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "FOUND"
}

Rows created

• Source 31c98c52-8419-8c44-a6ad-6bbc8c5af704
• SourceLocation 27f6b1bd-6f41-85af-8047-8d5ff5767af5
• EvidenceItem 0ec82a94-0535-8072-8664-8e16ddebeee2
• EvidenceClaimLink e70ac60a-5b4b-8e0c-9ea5-b96c6ebbfe76 (accepted seq 10446)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"us_economics","task_type":"OPPOSING_EVIDENCE_SEARCH","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}