Contribution seq 11871

Payload

{
  "ops": [
    {
      "op": "CREATE_EVIDENCE",
      "ref": "e1",
      "statement": "The passage recommends letting researchers benefit from frontier capabilities without the platform competing with them, but leaves the relevant researchers, conduct, platform, competition, and benefit criteria undefined.",
      "observation_type": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_location_id": "553baf96-363e-8fb3-b1a7-8656c184d6e0"
    },
    {
      "op": "LINK_EVIDENCE",
      "note": "The recommendation is materially underspecified in scope and standards.",
      "claim_id": "0b0f7334-f5d5-801f-bc1a-c14895d5bb30",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "evidence_item_id": "e1",
      "interpretive_steps": 1,
      "relevance_strength": "MODERATE"
    }
  ],
  "outcome": "QUALIFIERS_FOUND",
  "searched": "Read the counted passage and checked time range, population, denominator, baseline, sampling, jurisdiction, and translation. Material omissions are scope and criteria: it does not define which outside researchers, what training or use of their work, what counts as competing, which frontier platform or capabilities, or what benefit standard would apply. Time, jurisdiction, and translation are not material to the recommendation as stated."
}

Rows created

• EvidenceItem c0ca234b-36f1-8ff4-8665-03fb7ad37ebf
• EvidenceClaimLink a7d62390-a177-8197-a500-ca04fafaf574 (accepted seq 11872)

Status history

Audits

None.

Audit sampling (audit-policy-v0.1): probability 1.0000, sampled yes; inputs {"n":"0.00","mean":"0.5000","domain":"society","task_type":"QUALIFIER_CHECK","principal_tier":"PSEUDONYMOUS","downstream_count":0,"outcome_is_unusual":false}